Streamlining Without Compromising: How to Balance Efficiency, Compliance, and Accountability

How do we streamline processes without losing sight of compliance and accountability?

It’s a question that keeps many of us in policy, governance, and reform awake at night (or is that just me?). The tension is real: the demand for efficiency keeps growing, yet the need for integrity, trust, and accountability hasn’t gone anywhere.

But efficiency and integrity don’t have to compete. In fact, when we design systems thoughtfully, they can reinforce each other. Streamlining is not about cutting corners — it’s about building smarter systems that respect both people’s time and public trust.

Here are some strategies that I’ve found make a difference:

1. Audit the Process, Not Just the People

Old systems often create unnecessary friction. Sometimes we keep steps in place long after they’ve lost their purpose, simply because “that’s how it’s always been done.”

Process mapping is a powerful antidote. By breaking down a workflow step by step, you can see exactly where duplication, dead ends, or legacy practices are slowing things down. Removing or updating those steps doesn’t weaken compliance — it strengthens it, because the process becomes clearer and easier to follow.

2. Make Compliance Intuitive

If compliance feels like an add-on, people are more likely to see it as a burden. But if it’s embedded seamlessly into the process, it becomes second nature.

Automating compliance requirements through forms, workflows, or required fields helps ensure important checks aren’t skipped. When compliance is intuitive and frictionless, it saves time while reducing risk.

3. Use Smart Automation Wisely

The right question isn’t “Can I automate this?” — it’s “Should I?”

Routine, low-risk, and repetitive tasks are usually good candidates for automation. Things like document filing, reminders, or data entry can be streamlined, freeing up people for higher-value work.

At the same time, keep workflows in place to record and monitor automated tasks. This ensures transparency and avoids a “black box” effect where no one can see what the system is doing.

Automation done well should create space for human judgment — not replace it.

4. Invest in People

Technology and process change only succeed if people are equipped and motivated to use them. Fostering a culture of curiosity and improvement helps staff feel part of the solution rather than subject to it.

Encourage innovation at every level. Sometimes the best ideas for efficiency come from those closest to the process. When people feel trusted and supported to suggest improvements, compliance becomes a shared responsibility rather than a top-down directive.

5. Break Down Silos with Collaboration

Working in isolation often leads to duplication — two teams solving the same problem in different ways, or reinventing the wheel with every project.

Cross-team and cross-agency collaboration allows resources to be used more efficiently and creates better insights. Standardise where it makes sense, customise where it matters, and share knowledge openly.

Collaboration doesn’t just make processes more efficient — it also builds accountability, because decisions and risks are owned collectively rather than hidden in silos.

Efficiency and Integrity Can Work Together

The goal of streamlining isn’t to get more done at the expense of trust. It’s to build smarter, more resilient systems that serve both.

When we design processes with accountability in mind, efficiency naturally follows. Compliance is no longer a hurdle to clear, but part of the road itself.

As we rethink systems in law, government, and reform, this balance is essential: respecting people’s time while upholding public trust.

Previous
Previous

May v Costaras [2025] NSWCA 178

Next
Next

Responsible AI in Law and Government: Beyond Speed